Feedback from the sector:
FSRA received four submissions from stakeholders in the Ontario credit union / caisses populaires sector, each of which provided feedback on FSRA’s proposed Statement of Priorities for fiscal 2023-2024 during the consultation period (October 13 to November 11, 2022).
FSRA thanks all stakeholders that took the time to comment. FSRA carefully considered all comments before finalizing and publishing the 2023-2026 Annual Business Plan.
Contributors:
The following stakeholders submitted comments on FSRA’s proposed SOP for fiscal 2023-2024:
Organization | Representative |
---|---|
1. Alterna Savings |
José Gallant |
2. Canadian Credit Union Association |
Andrei Belik |
3. Desjardins Group |
Giuseppina Marra |
4. Libro Credit Union |
Stephen Bolton |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
All stakeholders expressed broad support for FSRA’s proposed SOP as it relates to credit unions (CUs).
|
FSRA thanks stakeholders for their submission and the support expressed for the key deliverables included in the proposed 2023-2024 Statement of Priorities and Budget.
Supervisory excellence is FSRA’s objective for regulating and overseeing the CU sector, in a manner consistent with its statutory objects and principles and the dynamic environment in which Ontario CUs operate.
As noted below, FSRA is developing a multi-year workplan for rules, guidance and other regulatory initiatives that will support FSRA’s priority to achieve supervisory excellence, while helping CUs to plan and allocate their resources. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders noted the importance of a comprehensive workplan for all major CU initiatives, to assist the sector in planning its resources and providing timely, comprehensive responses to FSRA’s requests.
|
FSRA is developing a multi-year workplan for rules, guidance and other regulatory initiatives that will help CUs to plan and allocate their resources. Prior to finalizing the workplan, FSRA will seek input from the Technical Advisory Committee on Regulatory and Supervisory Initiatives and Stakeholder Advisory Committee, which are key CU stakeholders. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders expressed concerns about FSRA’s increased costs, and appreciation for the fact that a significant portion of the increase in costs for fiscal 2023/24 is being offset by an allocation of FSRA’s surplus.
A stakeholder noted that this surplus allocation is a one-time measure; another noted the significant cumulative impact of raising CUs’ assessment fees over the last three years. |
FSRA thanks stakeholders for their comments and will continue to proactively manage its costs to ensure they are reasonable and commensurate with its necessary regulatory efforts. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders expressed concern with respect to the turnover of relationship managers and other staff and noted that this could have a negative impact on prudential and stakeholder engagement outcomes. |
FSRA agrees that being able to attract and retain talented individuals is essential in order to achieve its mandate and will endeavour to mitigate any potential negative impact on the sector as new skilled staff are onboarded. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders expressed concerns about the pace of change on account of significant recent legislative and regulatory developments impacting the CU sector.
|
FSRA is developing a multi-year workplan for rules, guidance and other regulatory initiatives that takes these concerns into consideration.
FSRA thanks stakeholders for their support and contributions to the development of the CUCPA 2020. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders expressed support for a review of the CAR Rule but requested that consultations not occur until 2024/25.
|
FSRA will take stakeholders’ views as to the timing of consultations on the CAR Rule review into consideration when developing the multi-year workplan (noted above).
FSRA has received feedback from a number of CUs as they were implementing the CAR Rule, effective March 1, 2022. FSRA’s review would focus on additional clarifications to address this feedback, as well as identify opportunities to better align capital with risk. FSRA will continue to monitor developments related to capital requirements and time the review of the CAR Rule to address these developments in a timely manner. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders requested that the implementation of the DPS methodology not occur until 2024/25 or before a “test year” had been conducted.
|
FSRA will continue to be transparent and collaborative and take a consultative approach with the CU sector in implementing the revised DPS methodology. The public consultation on the proposed DPS methodology started on November 23rd, 2022. As detailed in the consultation paper, a transition period for the implementation of the proposed methodology has been developed. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
A stakeholder expressed the hope that FSRA would show a greater link between emerging risks and trends (e.g., open banking and environment, social and governance (ESG) issues) and planned supervisory activities.
|
FSRA is developing a multi-year workplan for CU rules, guidance and other regulatory initiatives. The prioritization of rules, guidance and other regulatory initiatives in FSRA’s workplan, which is currently under development, will reflect emerging risks and trends, among other things.
|
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders commented on FSRA’s EDC initiative. They acknowledged the linkage between FSRA’s objective of improving its risk-based supervisory approach and enhanced data collection.
|
FSRA will continue to work collaboratively with the CU sector to implement the EDC initiative, in compliance with all applicable laws, including privacy laws, in a manner that does not create an undue burden on CUs. Aligned with the principle of proportionality, FSRA will adjust its expectations accordingly for CUs that are smaller and/or less complex.
The EDC data that will be collected is information that CUs should already have as part of adequate and modern risk management practices. OSFI has been collecting similar data since 2014 and BCFSA has been doing the same since 2017. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders expressed support for FSRA’s efforts to secure access for CUs to emergency lending assistance (ELA) from the Bank of Canada (BOC) in the event of unexpected shocks and events. |
FSRA thanks stakeholders for their support and will continue to work with the Bank of Canada and other involved stakeholders to promote access to sufficient emergency liquidity facilities for Ontario CUs. |
Stakeholders | Summary of Stakeholders’ Feedback | FSRA’s Response |
---|---|---|
|
A stakeholder expressed support for a proposed rule governing unclaimed deposits but suggested that it should be broadened to encompass the related issues of account closures and member termination.
|
FSRA thanks stakeholders for their support of the proposed unclaimed deposits rule (and related registry) and will consult with the sector and the public on the contents of the proposed rule. |